On October
11, 2012 in the Vice Presidential debate moderator Martha Raddatz went on to
Syria – saying it’s estimated that 25-30,000 people have been killed. She said
in March 2011 the president explained why we went into Libya – it was in the
national interest to go and prevent further massacres from occurring there. So
why doesn’t the same logic apply to Syria? Biden said Syria has 5 times the
geographic area with 20% of the population of Libya; it’s in a part of the
country where if the wrong people get control it’s going to blow up; we’re
working with ALL the people in the region to determine who should be in charge
when Assad falls; the last thing Americans need is to put troops on the ground;
Romney when pressured doesn’t say what he’d do. Ryan in response said – nobody
is proposing to send troops to Syria but we wouldn’t be outsourcing our foreign
policy to the UN giving Putin veto power over this issue; he did acknowledge
that Hillary Clinton did go to Putin and tell him he’s on the wrong side but
said this is just one more example of how the Russian reset is not working; the
longer this goes on the more groups like Al Qaeda are spilling in to Syria; had
we had a better plan working with our allies going in we could have more easily
identified the Free Syrian Army (FSA), the freedom fighters but we waited for Kofi Annan to come up with an agreement
through the UN and that bought Assad time.
Martha
asked – what happens if Assad doesn’t fall. Ryan said Iran keeps its greatest
ally in the region; we and the world lose our credibility on this. Biden
responded with NATO and our allies were all on the same page with trying to get
a settlement; Russia has a different agenda than we do. Martha asked – what
would the Romney/Ryan ticket do – Ryan said we’re on the same page when it
comes to sending troops in to secure the chemical weapons; we would have tried
to work with the FSA and freedom fighters sooner and wouldn’t have waited for
Russia to give us a green light; Iran is flying over Iraq (there are plenty of
articles about Turkey handling this). Biden said – and the (Syrian) opposition
is being armed. Ryan didn’t answer the question so Martha asked what his
criteria was for intervention in the world – Ryan responded with - what’s in
the national security interest of the American people. Martha said – no
humanitarian aid – Ryan said each situation will come up with its own set of
circumstances but as far as putting American troops on the ground it has to be
in the national security interest of the American people; it means things like
embargos, sanction and over-flights (in other words they have no criteria for
intervention and they would have done nothing different). I have information on
Kofi Annan’s attempts to negotiate and the UN process but I see no point in
going into it as Ryan used hindsight to just attack and he had no reasonable
answers or plans on foreign policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment