Per a
Cornell University Global Labor Institute (GLI) 2012 report: Debates over
proposed tar sands pipelines such as the Transcanada Corporation’s Keystone XL
has given little attention to the negative impact of pipeline spills. Tar sands
oil is different than conventional oil; it has many different properties that
may increase the frequency of pipeline spills and recent experience has
demonstrated the spills pose additional dangers to the public and present
special challenges in terms of clean up. An independent analysis of historical
spill data concluded that Keystone XL could, over a 50-year period, generate up
to 91 major spills. The proposed route for the 1,700-mile pipeline will
transport more than 830,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day, cut through 6 US
states (Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas) and cross
1,748 bodies of water, including the Missouri and Yellowstone rivers, and the
Ogallala and Carrizo-Wilcox aquifers. This is America’s agricultural heartland,
where farming, ranching and tourism are major employers and economic engines.
Ground or surface water contamination in this region could inflict significant
economic damage, causing workers to lose jobs, businesses to close, residents
to relocate and negatively impact the health of residents and their communities.
Between 2007 and 2010 pipelines transporting tar sands oil in the northern
Midwest have spilled 3 times more oil per mile than the US national average for
conventional crude. Since the initial Keystone 1 pipeline began operation in
June 2010, at least 35 spills have occurred in the US and Canada; in its first
year, the US section had a spill frequency 100 times greater than Transcanada’s
forecast. In June 2011 federal pipeline safety regulators determined Keystone 1
was a hazard to public safety and issued Transcanada a corrective action order.
GLI estimates that construction of Keystone XL would create between 33,000 and
44,000 person years of employment; between 30 and 40% of the job numbers
estimated by Transcanada (the January 2012 State Department’s Report to
Congress following the presidential permit denial also concluded that the
numbers were inflated).
On April 18, 2012 Ryan voted for HR 4348 - Extension of Surface Transportation Funding and Approval
of the Keystone XL Pipeline; September 6 Transcanada proposed a new
route for the pipeline. Now, you can believe the Republicans (motivated by
greed) about the job numbers and underscored risks of the pipeline or you can
believe the experts (motivated by a concern for our safety).
No comments:
Post a Comment